Comparison

BriefAuthority and the other ways to build a Table of Authorities.

The short answer: most TOA tools are Word add-ins for Windows, cloud platforms, or services you send the brief to. BriefAuthority is the one built to work from the final PDF, on a Mac, without uploading it. BriefAuthority is not Best Authority and is not affiliated with Litera. Competitors are described by what they publish — we don't state anyone's accuracy.

Pricing checked on each vendor's site on 2026-09-24.

Eleven ways, side by side

  • Yes
  • No
  • Partly / connects to a service
  • Not stated by the vendor

in your favoragainst, on a Mac with a brief you can't upload

Table of Authorities tools compared by how they work, published pricing, whether the brief is uploaded, and whether they work on a Mac.
ToolHow it worksPricing (as published)Uploads the brief?Works on Mac?
Litera Best AuthorityWord add-in (Windows)Not published by Litera; ~$65/document reported by LawNext (2019)
No. No — runs inside Word
Not stated by the vendor. Not advertised; positioned as a Word for Windows add-in
Benchly ezBriefsWord add-in, account required$600/year for solos; firms by quote
Partly — connects to a service. Connects to Benchly's service
Not stated by the vendor. Not stated; confirm with vendor
ClearbriefWord add-in, cloud platform$300/month per user (Solo)
Partly — connects to a service. Cloud-based
Not stated by the vendor. Not stated; confirm with vendor
Lexis Create+Add-in in Microsoft 365 WordNot published
Partly — connects to a service. Connected to LexisNexis
Not stated by the vendor. Not stated; confirm with vendor
Thomson Reuters Drafting AssistantTied to Westlaw / Practical LawNot published
Partly — connects to a service. Connected to Thomson Reuters
Not stated by the vendor. Not stated; confirm with vendor
BriefMarkBrowser tool; reads a Word .docx and writes Word's TA field codes back, so the table is built in WordFree up to 8 authorities; Pro $99 one-time
No. No — runs in the browser tab
Yes. Yes, with Word for Mac
Jurisage TOA builderBrowser app; you upload the documentNot published on its TOA page
Yes. Yes, by design
Yes. Browser-based
TypeLawHuman formatting service$1,895 per brief
Yes. Yes — you send the brief
Yes. Yes (it's a service)
Word for WindowsMark Citation, then Insert Table of AuthoritiesIncluded with Word
No. No
No. No — unsupported in Word for Mac and the web, per Microsoft
General chatbot (e.g. ChatGPT)Paste or upload the brief, ask for a TOAFree / subscription
Yes. Yes
Yes. Yes
BriefAuthorityPre-launch · early accessReads the final PDF in the browser, review screen, .docxPlanned $39 one-time or $9 per brief
No. No — processed on your computer
Yes. Yes, any modern browser

Swipe the table sideways; the tool column stays put.

Descriptions and prices are as each vendor publishes them, or as reported where noted. “Not stated” means we couldn't find it on the vendor's site — ask them before you buy. The BriefAuthority row is the specification as designed, confirmed at launch.

Decision list

Which one fits your situation

Find the line that sounds like you, then read across.

  1. Windows firm, heavy appellate volume, existing license

    Keep Best Authority.

  2. You already pay for Lexis or Westlaw and want research inside Word

    Ask about Lexis Create+ or Drafting Assistant in your plan.

  3. Solo who wants cite checking plus a TOA in Word

    Benchly or Clearbrief (subscription).

  4. High-stakes brief you want fully formatted by people

    TypeLaw.

  5. Windows, an occasional brief, no budget

    Word's built-in Mark Citation.

  6. Mac, Google Docs or Pages; the final brief is a PDF; you can't upload it

    BriefAuthority (in development).

Candidly

When BriefAuthority is the wrong choice

  • If you need citation checking (is it still good law, is the pin cite right), use a citator or a tool built for it.
  • If your firm is on Windows with a Best Authority license, stay with it.
  • And BriefAuthority isn't available yet — early access only.